Tuesday, 21 May 2013
       
AUSQLUG Forums Home   Search   Login   Register   Member List  

  Viewing User Profile for: JSBBS
 About  Contact
Joined: 04 Mar 2005 03:15 PM
Last Login: 23 Aug 2010 04:45 AM
Website: http://www.jsbbs.com.au/
Location: Unavailable to anonymous users.
Occupation: Unavailable to anonymous users.
Interests: Unavailable to anonymous users.
Signature:
Email: Unavailable to anonymous users.
MSN IM: Unavailable to anonymous users.
AIM: Unavailable to anonymous users.
Yahoo IM: Unavailable to anonymous users.
ICQ: Unavailable to anonymous users.
 Post Statistics
JSBBS has contributed to 6 out of 1,785 total posts (0.34% of total).
Most Recent Posts:
Adding a column to a table at a particular location 13/03/2008 10:04:52 AM   (Total replies: 1)
Has anyone tried to add a column at a particular location without the old ... 1. create a temp table based on the original with the columns in the sequence you wish, 2. copy data across 3. delete original table 4. rename new table as original I (vaguely) recall the ability to modify the column ordering via updates to the sys tables. Is this (still) possible (by either T-SQL or CLR programming)? All help appreciated. John

Re: Adding a column to a table at a particular location 14/03/2008 12:34:13 PM   (Total replies: 1)
I've been asked to add columns at a particular location (ie, within the existing columns). I am personally against this but....

Re: Adding a column to a table at a particular location 31/07/2008 9:30:05 AM   (Total replies: 0)
Sorry about the long delay, but I finally managed to do this. And thanks Uri. I did follow your recmomendation of creating a temporary table with the new definition, then copying data across, and then renaming it. Of course, contraints and FKs were troublesome.

Re: Should table variables be changed to work IN-MEMORY exclusively? 5/04/2006 2:52:32 PM   (Total replies: 0)
Further to Darren's snippet, table variables aren't subject to transactions (yes, it is true). That leads me to another 'nice to have'.... autonomous transactions (an Oracle concept). This is great for automated sql jobs that need to be transaction aware but rows inserted into a logging (or instrumentation etc.) table are never affected by the success or failure of the transaction. John

Re: Rowcount revisited 1/06/2005 10:02:48 AM   (Total replies: 1)
On a previous large scale db, I ran across the same issue. After a lot of digging around MS and various SQL sites, I discovered someone figured out the the system tables could be used to retrieve the recordcount rather than querying the table in question. Try this stored procedure... Create Procedure dbo.pr_RecordCount ( @pTableName nvarchar(128) ) As Set nocount on select rows as Count from sysobjects o inner join sysindexes i on o.id = i.id where i.indid < 2 and ...

Re: Caching Objects in ASP.Net 20/05/2005 9:24:33 AM   (Total replies: 0)
Another approach is to cache data using the CacheBlock and expire it at midnight (arbitrary time). I use a central class that contains a couple of generic DataAccess calls and adds to the Cache with midnight expiry. It exposes a (static) method for each specific dataset/datatable. The Business Layer uses this class to get the data by calling the specific method for the data it wants ( that's all the BL needs to know). The cache class will check if it is already cached - great, just ...

Search for more...